Independent research · Public working papers

Research
library

Conceptual work at the intersection of software, systems, institutions and human responsibility.

Every paper is versioned, citable and explicit about its evidence boundary. These are drafts for scrutiny—not marketing articles, peer-reviewed findings or institutional positions.

Catalogue · 2026

Working papers

  1. 01Conceptual working paper

    Systems engineering · Human-centred AI · Organisation studies

    OrganoSphere: A Conceptual Architecture for Human-Machine Organisational Intelligence

    v0.114 August 202618 min read

    This working paper develops OrganoSphere as a public conceptual model for joining situated human intelligence and computational machine intelligence inside an engineered, governed organisational environment. It argues that useful human-machine coordination depends less on model capability alone than on explicit boundaries, traceable decisions, observable software, institutional memory and retained human accountability. The paper offers a vocabulary, a conceptual equation, design propositions and a research agenda. It does not disclose a production implementation, report an experiment, make a clinical claim or present validated scientific evidence.

  2. 02Conceptual working paper

    AI governance · Systems engineering · Technology and society

    The Adaptation Differential: Engineering Society for Rapid AI Capability Change

    v0.114 August 202620 min read

    This conceptual working paper examines the possibility that artificial-intelligence capability can advance faster than societies can absorb it safely and productively. It treats exponential growth as a scenario rather than a universal empirical law, then defines an adaptation differential between a moving technical frontier and domain-specific readiness across institutions, work, education, governance, culture and infrastructure. From an ITMan Intelligence perspective, the paper proposes practical engineering responses: capability envelopes, staged deployment, traceable authority, continuous evaluation, incident learning, skills renewal and public-infrastructure planning. The model is a decision aid, not a forecast, causal estimate or claim of peer-reviewed evidence.